The worker had no physical or mental impairment that could influence driving.

HE solve he resource of cassation for the unification of doctrine presented by the actor against the ruling of July 13, 2022 of the TSJ of Andalusia (rec. petition no. 738/2022) formulated against the ruling of the Social Court No. 9 of Malaga of February 10, 2022 (records no. 935/2021), which declared the dismissal appropriate.

The worker, who had been providing services as a mechanical driver since June

The ruling confirms that the employee sought to fraudulently obtain unemployment, but the action taken is not considered reckless.

It resolves the appeal presenting for the legal representation of the worker before the Sentence of the Social Court 2 of Barcelona of date July 3, 2023 (lawsuit for dismissal with case number 309/2021), being appealed by the defendant company and FOGASA.

The worker provided services with an indefinite contract and was a cleaner, but was on leave.leave of

The Court determines that the dismissal is justified, without evidence of fraud or discrimination

The appeal No. 1019/2023 presented by the company against the ruling dated August 2, 2023 of the Social Court No. 15 of Madrid is resolved (orders 107/2023)for dismissal and protection of fundamental rights.

The worker provided services from July 22, 2022 to January 13, 2023, under a full-time fixed-term contract linked to a program financed by European funds,as internship tutor. In the

Extending the permit to non-dependent people generates abusive use at the employer's expense.

On June 30, 2021, the Collective Conflict demand before the Social Chamber of the National Court (orders no. 204/2021) in which it was requested that "(...) the right of workers to enjoy 35 hours of accompanying the father or mother's doctor is declared, without it being necessary for them to be in charge of the worker, or be dependent, and consequently with the above, the company is

The company does not prove the completion of the work for which the employee was hired

The Court has partially upheld the appeal filed by the worker against ruling No. 37/2023 of February 28, issued by the Social Court No. 1 of Reus (dismissal orders No. 1019/2020).

The plaintiff, Mr. Justiniano, had been working for a company specialized in forestry and logging within the agricultural sector. He was hired on November 18, 2019, under the contract modality for specific work

For the High Court, a change of shifts cannot be required rotating morning and afternoon to a single shift

The Supreme Court resolves an appeal for the unification of doctrine against the sentence handed down by the Social Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Murcia (Rec. Suplicación no. 1350/2018) formulated against the sentence of the Social Court 2 of Cartagena (orders no. 250/2018).

The workerShe provided services in a department store with a full-time indefinite contract and

The payment of vacations pending enjoyment in 2015 accrued while on sick leave due to temporary disability due to 18 months having elapsed is not applicable.

The Supreme Court resolves the appeal for unification of doctrine filed against the ruling handed down by the Social Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of the Basque Country (rec. petition no. 865/2020) formulated against the ruling handed down by the Social Court no. 8 of Bilbao (orders no. 479/2018).

The worker provided

Recognition of trienniums in periods in which there was no effective provision of services

The appeal for the unification of doctrine filed against the ruling handed down by the Social Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Castilla y León (Burgos) 292/2022 (recourse. Supplication 187/2022) formulated against the ruling handed down by the Social Court No. 1 of Ávila (records 605/2021) “claim of right and amount” against a Department is upheld. of an Autonomous Community.

The question that arises

The Court rejects compensation for violation of the right to digital disconnection, because this right does not have the character of a fundamental right and ratifies the lower court ruling determining that it is not appropriate to grant compensation for the violation of the right to digital disconnection.

The Social Court no. As a result of the situation, the worker had a psychiatric pathology that led him to be on medical leave due to a common illness. The claim is

The admissibility of the dismissal is declared as it is carried out in accordance with the law, despite a worker being hired just before carrying out an objective dismissal, considering in this case the amortization of the job.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling no. 732/2023 of October 10 resolves the appeal for unification of doctrine no. 3103/2021 filed against the ruling of the Superior Court of Justice of Valencia, appeal no. 667/2020, formulated against ruling of the Social Court