Selection of relevant sentences that may be of interest to use as contrast sentences,
mainly in matters of Social Security and labor law.
You will also find summaries of current and non-perishable regulations.
You can interact with these posts in the Assessor's Corner
Discussion Forum
The Court rejects the allegation of unfair dismissal, confirming that the loss of the work permit justifies the termination of the contract, even if the resolution was not final, due to the lack of recourse on the part of the worker.
The Social Chamber has resolved the appeal no. 644/2023, filed against the ruling of the Social Court No. 2 of Palma de Mallorca, issued on May 5, 2023 (orders no. 342/2021).
The worker, Mr. Dionisio, had been providing services
The Court considers that the company did not adequately justify the termination of the contract, since there was no real and objective cause to dismiss the worker.
The ruling of the Superior Court of Justice resolves the appeal No. 363/2024 filed by both the defendant company and the worker D. Estanislao, against the ruling handed down by the Social Court No. 09 of Madrid on October 5, 2023.
Mr. Estanislao, father of 4 children aged between 11 and 2 years
The admissibility of the dismissal is confirmed as it was a dismissal prior to the TS ruling of 11/18/24 and as the lack of a hearing at the appropriate time was not challenged.
The appeal number 231/2024, filed by the legal representation of the worker against the ruling number 50/24, dated February 14, 2024, issued by the Social Court number 5 of Palma, in the dismissal procedure (orders 715/2022), is resolved.
The worker,Ms. Adela, performed duties as a
The National Court decides that the permit can be extended up to five days if home rest is prescribed, even if the patient has been discharged from hospital.
Procedure No. 391/2024 is resolved regarding collective conflict, presented by several unions against a company in the graphic arts sector, paper and cardboard handling, publishing and auxiliary industries(BOE no. 245, of October 13, 2023).
The object of the conflict is the recognition of the right of workers to fully enjoy the
The worker's interpretation of the vacation request procedure in the company does not justify his absence.
The appeal No. 2761/2024, filed by Mr. Juan Pedro against the ruling of the Social Court No. 4 of León (Orders 200/24), dated September 9, 2024, in relation to his dismissal, is resolved.
Mr. Juan Pedro worked as a supervisor with a full-time indefinite contract. On December 30, 2023, the company informed him of his disciplinary dismissal with effect from the same day, alleging
The company was sentenced to adapt the worker's working hours and pay compensation for violating her fundamental rights.
The appeal number 499/24 filed by the legal representation of Ms. Carlota against the ruling of the Social Court No. 12 of Madrid (orders No. 637/2023) issued on February 26, 2024 is resolved.
Ms. Carlota, a lawyer in the company since 2001, requested to return in April 2023 after taking a leave of absence to care for her daughter, born with a
The TSJ of Madrid declares the dismissal null and void, considering that the company should have specified the reasons, although it was unaware of the worker's pregnancy.
The appeal 187/2024, filed against the ruling handed down by the Social Court No. 19 of Madrid in proceedings 647/2023, dated November 10, 2023, regarding dismissal, is resolved.
Ms. Sandra provided services for the defendant company from May 8, 2023, with the category of teleoperator and under a temporary part-time contract due to
The Court maintains that the company should have assigned the employee to another service instead of opting for dismissal.
The appeal No. 764/2024 filed against the ruling dated June 4, 2024, issued by the Single Social Court of Huesca in cases No. 557/2023, is resolved.
Mr. Juan Antonio filed a lawsuit for dismissal against a company in the construction sector. He had been serving in the company since September 16, 2020 with an indefinite contract and 1st Officer category. On
“The dismissal was an illegitimate reaction to the employee's previous claims, violating his fundamental right to effective judicial protection.”
The appeal for the unification of doctrine is resolved, against the ruling of the TSJ of Extremadura No. 5464/2023, formulated against the ruling of the Social Court No. 5 of Badajoz with case number 730/2022.
The worker, Jesús Miguel, was providing services as a driver since August 16, 2021.
On July 6, 2022, Jesús Miguel refused to perform additional service, arguing
The Court considers that the offense committed is not serious enough to justify disciplinary dismissal, despite the fact that he used the uniform and vehicle of the company for which he worked as an employee.
The appeal number 1615/24 filed against the ruling of the dismissal process with case number 268/23 of the Social Court of Melilla is resolved.
D. Mateo worked since 2013 as an official telecommunications technician for a company dedicated to communications (distribution of mobile and landline
