Selection of relevant sentences that may be of interest to use as contrast sentences,
mainly in matters of Social Security and labor law.
You will also find summaries of current and non-perishable regulations.
You can interact with these posts in the Assessor's Corner
Discussion Forum
The right of a worker to modify her schedule in alternate weeks to care for her daughter under joint custody is recognized.
The Appeal Appeal 115/2024 filed by the worker against the ruling of the Social Court No. 11 of Bilbao, dated July 4, 2023, is resolved, procedure “Other individual labor rights”.
Mrs. Paulina, employee since 2012 of an international chain selling furniture and home accessories in Barakaldo,She is divorced and shares custody of her 12-year-old daughter on
The lack of specification of the duration of the trial period expressed as “according to agreement” It violates the worker's right to know its exact duration, making the contractual clause invalid and classifying the termination of the contract as unfair dismissal.
The appeal for the unification of doctrine is resolvedfiled against the ruling issued on November 23, 2022 by the Social Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid (Rec. Suplication No. 679/2022), filed against the ruling dated
The Court considers that the company acted diligently.
Appeal No. 180/2024 is resolved on the ruling of the Social Court No. 36 of Madrid (records No. 539/2023), matter of dismissal and claim for amount.
Mr. Adolfo, had been providing services for the defendant company as a driver since March 11, 2023. The company notified him of his dismissal effective March 27, 2023, alleging unjustified absences.
The company notified the dismissal on several occasions, through a digital platform, but Mr. Adolfo
The Court determines that the burden of proof regarding the working day falls on the company.
Appeal number 1038/23 is resolved, against the ruling of the Social Court No. 45 of Madrid (orders No. 320/2023).
Mr. Cándido, a hostel worker, sued his company for payment of unpaid overtime and night hours between March and November 2022. Employed part-time since 2015, he claims a total of 67,036.12 euros plus interest. The company alleged the closure of the business as a reason
The Court ratifies the compensated termination of the contract and increases the compensation for violation of fundamental rights to 20,000 euros, describing the business conduct as serious and persistent.
The appeal number 218/2024 filed by both parties is resolved, in relation to the ruling issued by the Social Court No. 3 of Malaga on a case of protection of fundamental rights.
The worker began providing services as a security guard for the defendant company on January 19, 2018. On April
The worker alleges violation of fundamental rights and requests an annulment while the company maintains that it believed she was on medical leave. The dismissal is declared unfair.
Appeal is resolved 1135/2024 filed by the legal representation of Ms. Danitza, against ruling 88/2024 issued by the Social Court No. 6 of Oviedo, in the dismissal procedure 810/2023.
Mrs. Danitza provided services as a waitress, with a full-time indefinite contract with a seniority date of 10/1/2021, being the Collective Agreement
The ruling highlights the worker's failure to comply with his contractual obligations and violation of the principle of good faith that governs labor relations.
Appeal No. 1112/2024 is resolved, against the judgment issued by the Social Court No. 3 of Ciudad Real (orders No. 655/2023).
The worker provided services as a stretcher bearer in an ICU ambulance, with an indefinite contract and a seniority of January 1, 2009. On May 13, 2020, he requested a reduction of working hours
The worker who claimed incapacity for her usual job exhibited an active life on Instagram, incompatible with her employment situation.
The appeal is resolved (nº3317/2023), filed against the ruling of the Social Court No. 14 of Valencia, (orders 67/2023).The question to be resolved It is whether there has been a serious and culpable breach of labor that could justify disciplinary dismissal.
The worker, Ms. Encarnación, had been providing services since June 16, 2008 as an administrator in a company
The worker cannot prove systematic abusive behavior on the part of the company
The appeal No. 2120/2024 is resolved, filed against the ruling issued by the Social Court No. 4 of Lugo, on February 21, 2024, of procedure No. 616/2023, dismissal/termination in general.
Mr. Bernardo, worked as a kitchen assistant in a restaurant and had an indefinite part-time contract. He suffered a work accident on December 27, 2023, when his boss went to grab some dishes from the cupboards and
The ruling indicates that the reimbursement of glasses should be treated individually, not as a collective dispute.
It resolves the appeal(nº 583/2024) filed by a Union of Municipal Employees on the ruling of November 10, 2023, issued by the Social Court No. 14 of Seville (orders 283/23), which requested reimbursement of the cost of glasses for municipal employees who use display screens in their work. The lawsuit regarding a collective dispute was filed against a City Council and the
